Patriotism Exposing the Enemies Within

(The Shadow of Marxism)

 
  Home BLOG      

Home
Political Enemies
  Barack Obama
  Geroge Soros

Liberal Insanity
Organizations

  DNC
  MoveOn.org
  Socialist Party USA
  Communist Party USA
  Sierra Club
  ACLU
Media
Allies (Links)
Commentary
Store
Contact Us
Site Index
Blog
 
 
 


Hillary Clinton

 The Wicked Witch of the Left
 Hillary:   We're Going to Take Things Away From You

Hillary Clinton knows better than you do how to spend your paycheck. Really she does. Just ask her.
Sen. Clinton exposed her socialist agenda during a speech in San Francisco (which the Associated Press dubbed the "leftiest big city on the Left Coast").
She was quoted saying "Many of you are well enough off that ... the tax cuts may have helped you. We're saying that for America to get back on track, we're probably going to cut that short and not give it to you," she said at a fund-raiser for radical Sen. Barbara Boxer.

"We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good," the former first lady admitted.

Hillary, naturally, knows what "the common good" is.

The arrogance and condesending attitude is way to thick to even cut with a chainsaw. Who the @&$# left her charge to decide how much of our hard-earned money can be confuscated by this treasonist bitch.
Link to Senator Hillary Rohdam Clinton

Hillary Clinton on the issues

Let's go through the list where Hillary stands and disect each position. You decide if this falls in line with traditional American values and common sense.

>>> Hillary Clinton voted to ratify Kyoto; more mass tranist. (Sep 2000)

Does anyone know the cost to the American economy if the Kyoto treaty is ratified? If not let's look at the numbers.

In a domestic emissions trading system, permits lead to higher energy prices in order to encourage people to consume less. How much would energy prices rise? Using a U.S. Energy Information Agency ("EIA") study, the scenario of returning U.S. carbon emissions to 1990 levels (the Kyoto agreement is 7% below 1990 levels) would increase business, consumer, and government expenditures on energy by about $190 billion (in 1995 dollars). This includes:

$46 billion increase in residential expenditures on energy,
$29 billion by the commercial sector,
$65 billion by the industrial sector, and $51 billion by the transportation sector.

Under EIA’s global emissions trading scenario, the United States would likely send $10 to $12 billion?annually?to foreign countries in exchange for greenhouse emission permits -- to do the things we are already doing. Regardless of how the Kyoto trading regime is designed, American businesses, consumers, and workers will have great difficulty paying for?or stomaching?a stealth tax that, in reality, is massive foreign aid to a few countries.

>>> Voted YES on removing consideration of drilling ANWR from budget bill. (Mar 2003)

The value of ANWR is, "The Coastal Plain of ANWR's 1002 area is the nation's single greatest onshore oil reserve. The USGS estimates that it contains a mean expected value of 10.4 billion barrels of technically recoverable oil. To put that into context, the potential daily production from ANWR's 1002 area is larger than the current daily onshore oil production of any of the lower 48 states."

How does that turn translate into value? The US imports 58% of the oil it consumes. Shouldn't we be independent, not dependent on foreign oil? Apparently Hillary is against us being indepentent and more at the mercy of foreign producers

 

 


Website owned and designed by WebMediaTechs.com

ColdFusion Hosting by efree2net